🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial move to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Officials, campaigners, and families are observing with great interest to see if this tactic will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Trend

In Europe, a rising number of countries are considering parallel measures.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM declaring that phones and apps are "robbing our kids' youth". Legislation could be enacted soon.
• Norway is set to introduce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. The media minister have indicated that an similar ban is "one of the tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has urged parliament to approve a law lifting the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has endorsed a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Dutch government has recommended parents to prevent their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a advisory statement supporting a ban for under-16s without parental consent is granted. Although it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these platforms, the move does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A clear age limit is a solid foundation," stated one European lawmaker supporting the measure.

The UK: A Watchful Approach

Across Britain, the leadership has kept open a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any action must be "based on conclusive research".

Last year, momentum grew behind a proposal to impose controls on social media use by minors, but it was in the end weakened. However, the administration vowed to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have raised concerns. One foundation established by the relatives of a teenager who died after viewing dangerous online content suggests that a simple age ban might not improve online safety and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when young people reach the legal age.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the Silicon Valley to create products and services that are secure and age appropriate for young users," said a influential online safety campaigner.

America: A Decentralized Approach

Across America, regulation is mostly occurring at the state government level against a backdrop of federal inaction.

• The state of Utah demands adult approval for minors to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a law limiting minors to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with any further use needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed bills demanding guardian approval for under-16s to create social media accounts.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from certain politicians to follow Australia's example, a federal ban is currently seen as improbable.

International Outlook

Outside of Europe and the US, additional states are also taking action.

• The Malaysian government intends to restrict social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, global bodies take a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has advised that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "may even have unintended consequences". The body notes that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable youth and that bans should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to prioritize user protection.

While this worldwide conversation unfolds, the actions of the Australian government and several other countries show that states internationally are less and less willing to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.